![proposed laws](/images/p_law_header.png)
PA Bill Number: HB538
Title: In sexual violence, dating violence, domestic violence and stalking education, prevention and response at institutions of higher education and ...
Description: In sexual violence, dating violence, domestic violence and stalking education, prevention and response at institutions of higher education and .. ...
Last Action: Referred to EDUCATION
Last Action Date: Feb 10, 2025
![decrease font size](/images/decrease_font.png)
![increase font size](/images/increase_font.png)
Media Matters quotes Bloomberg supported researcher who calls for media to not talk to John Lott :: 11/05/2017
There is a long history of those associated with Michael Bloomberg and other gun control groups refusing to debate Dr. John Lott. Here is one example at C-SPAN where Bloomberg’s Everytown research director Ted Alcorn refused to debate. Other examples of Bloomberg and other gun control groups refusing to debate are available here.
Media Matters is upset that the Washington Post Fact Checker talked to Dr. Lott in evaluating Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) claim on CNN: “What we know is that states that have tougher gun laws, that keep criminals from getting guns, that keep those dangerous weapons like AR-15s out of the hands of civilians, have dramatically lower rates of gun violence.” The Post gave Murphy’s statement “three Pinocchios.” Media Matters quotes Dan Webster as saying:
Ironically, Media Matters and Webster ignore that the Washington Post also did a simultaneous fact check on a similar statement by Representative Steve Scalise (R-LA), and that Lott was also critical of that statement for the very similar reasons despite it being a claim made by a gun control advocate. The Post gave Murphy’s statement “four Pinocchios.” Indeed, Lott was the only person who was quoted who was critical of statements on both sides use of facts.
Media Matters cites the work of Dan Webster at the Bloomberg School of Public Health to back up part of Murphy’s statement:
Webster noted that “we have a growing body of research showing that permit to purchase laws dramatically reduce gun violence,” and pointed to laws in Connecticut and Missouri, explaining, “When Connecticut passed its permit to purchase law in 1995, that state experienced a 40% reduction in firearm homicide and a 15% reduction in firearm suicide in the 10 years following enactment. When Missouri repealed its permit to purchase law in 2008, that state experienced a 16% increase in both firearm homicide and firearm suicide. Additionally, Missouri experienced an increase in handgun assaults against law enforcement officers.”
Here are some of the problems with Webster’s work for Connecticut and Missouri (and here). Anyone who looks at those links will see that there are so many problems with Webster’s work that it is really hard to take it seriously.
This quote by Dan Webster is just part of a larger pattern by Bloomberg sponsored organizations to keep the media and public from hearing from Dr. Lott and the Crime Prevention Research Center. The CPRC’s board of academic advisors is available here.